1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Baltikumi légi rendészet - Baltic Air Policing

Diskurzus a(z) 'Egyéb katonai repüléssel, légi harcászattal kapcso' témában - Phoenix által indítva @ 2013. július 27..

  1. Phoenix

    Phoenix Well-Known Member Szerkesztőségi tag Moderátor

    A NATO balti misszióiról szóló topic
     
  2. joker

    joker Well-Known Member

    Ilyenkor mi a procedúra? Ordibálás a pilótával / jogosítványelvétel / elmagyarázni neki a navigáció alapjait és útjára engedni / pénzbűntetés?
     
  3. borisz

    borisz Well-Known Member

    Ebben a sorrendben. :)
     
  4. hiryu

    hiryu New Member

    http://nol.hu/kulfold/naponta_sertik_meg_a_roman_legteret
     
  5. zotyek78

    zotyek78 Well-Known Member

    Mekkorát linkeltek... :) Még ebben is jobbak a politikusainknál. :) "Nem árulhatják el, hogy honnan származnak a beazonosítatlan gépek". :D Epic!
     
  6. marton

    marton Well-Known Member

    Moldáv balhé? Erőfitogtatás? Vagy csak jelzi a ruszki, hogy ott van? Azt sem zárom ki, hogy amint nálunk a Hende a katasztrófavédelemmel próbálja lenyomni a heliket a nép torkán,ott az F-16-okat így akarják elfogadtatni.
     
  7. gacsat

    gacsat Well-Known Member

    Nem lett volna elég a lettekhez 4 F16os? Amúgy nem valami sokat repültek a balgák. Vajon milyen nyelven rádióznak a belga repülők?
     
  8. molnibalage

    molnibalage Well-Known Member

    Európában alig van már jenki vadász. Avianoban is csak egy század F-16-van, ezért ment gondolom angoloktól F-15C.
     
  9. Phoenix

    Phoenix Well-Known Member Szerkesztőségi tag Moderátor

    Havi 15-20 óra fejenként a NATO-áltaghoz képest sok. Volt, hogy egyes magyar pilóták egész évben repültek ennyit....

    Mivel a balti feladat NATO-misszió, és a (gyakorló és éles) riasztásokat a NATO-központ rendeli el, így angolul kell, hogy kommunikáljanak.
     
  10. blaze

    blaze Active Member

    Javítsatok ki ha nem így van de úgy tudom 50-80 körül mozog az átlag évi repült óra itthon. Azért az elég durva ha belegondolsz, hogy hetente szűk 1 órát repül az adott ember.
     
  11. imike

    imike Well-Known Member

    Azt értem, hogy négy gép van kint, 2 ad készültséget és 2 a tartalék, de ne már, hogy pilótából is csak 4 megy.

    Egyébként ha 4 pilóta 4 hónap alatt 300 óra, akkor a hazai repórákat figyelembe véve, tülekedni fognak a pilótáink, hogy kimehessenek 4 hónapra minél többet repülni.
     
  12. molnibalage

    molnibalage Well-Known Member

    Az. Nem is értem, hogy gcsat miért írta azt, amit. Ez egy évre felszorovzva nem sok, hanem ******sok...

    Az óraszámokat meg egy átlagember képzelje el úgy, hogy ő hány órát sportol egy hónapban, ha melegítést nem számolja bele. Na, így azért talán picit átértékelődik a gyakorlat.
     
  13. Tamas

    Tamas New Member

    Az amerikaiaknak 150 fő kell a feladat ellátásához, a belgáknak elég 50 fő ? Értem, hogy különböző típusú gépeik vannak, de ez túl nagy különbség.
    Vagy 150 főben benne vannak a szakácsok, takarítók is. Az 50 belga meg csak a pilóták és műszakiak?
     
  14. maiden67

    maiden67 New Member

    bohócparádé...A Baltikum védhetetlen 3 kis ország...egy NATO -gnóm.
     
    ghostrider likes this.
  15. anonim999

    anonim999 Well-Known Member

  16. anonim999

    anonim999 Well-Known Member

  17. Terminator

    Terminator Well-Known Member


    Data on the aircraft response borders of the Baltic states ( 2019.05.01 - 06.09. )




    05.01 - 05.05.

    From 1 May to 5 May, the NATO Air police functions in the Baltic States were not identified and accompanied in international space by military aircraft in the Russian Federation over the Baltic Sea.



    05.06 - 05.12.

    In the 6-12 of May, the NATO Air police functions in the Baltic States were not identified and accompanied by military aircraft in the international area over the Baltic Sea.



    05.13 - 05.19.


    On 13-19 of May, NATO'S Air police functions in the Baltic States were identified six times and accompanied by military aircraft in the international area over the Baltic Sea.



    On 13 May, NATO Air police fighters recognized the Russian Federation (RF) aircraft AN-26 as the international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad realm. AN-26 flew without a functioning radar transponder, supported by a regional air traffic control Centre (RSVC) with radio communication, had a flight plan.



    On the 14th of May, NATO Air Police fighters recognized two RF aircraft WITH-27 to meet the international airspace from Kaliningrad in the area to face the IL-22 of the aircraft and back again. The flight plan was not supported by the aircraft, without the use of radar transponders, which did not support the RSVC radio.



    On 14 May, NATO'S Air Police fighters recognized RF aircraft IL-22 and two-to-27 with international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. THE-27 halfway turned around and came back to RF in the mainland. The IL-22 flew with the radar transponder, supported with RSVC radio communication, had a flight plan. The Su-27 flew without the use of radar transponders, not supported by the RSVC radio, had no flight plan.



    On 15th of May, NATO Air Police fighters recognized two RF aircraft (IL-22) and two TO-27 in the international airspace from the RF Kaliningrad region to the RF mainland. Both THE-27 halfway turned around and came back. The IL-22 flew with the radar transponder, supported with RSVC radio communication, had a flight plan. The Su-27 was not operating with radar transponders, and the flight plan was not supported by the RSVC.



    On the 16th of May, NATO Air Police fighters identified the RF aircraft TU-134, which had an international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. TU-134 with the radar transponder on, the flight plan had not supported the RSVC radio communication.



    On 17 May, NATO Air Police fighters identified the RF aircraft TU-134, which wept through the international airspace from RF Kaliningrad to the RF mainland. TU-134 The flight plan with the radar transponder being activated, has not been supported by the RSVC radio.




    05.20 - 05.26



    On the 20-26 of May, NATO'S Air police functions in the Baltic states were twice to be identified and accompanied by aircraft in the international area over the Baltic Sea.



    On 24 May, NATO Air police fighters recognised the Russian Federation (RF) aircraft AN-12, which was operating from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. AN-12, without a functioning radar transponder, had a flight plan with the regional Air Traffic Control Centre (RSVC) supported by radio.



    On 26 May, NATO'S Air Police fighters identified the RF aircraft IL-76, which was operating under international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. IL-76 flew with the radar transponder, the flight plan did not have an RSVC radio connection supported.




    05.27-06.02.


    On the 27 May to 2 June, NATO'S Air police functions in the Baltics were identified six times as recognisable and accompanied in international space by aircraft flying over the Baltic Sea.



    On 27 May, NATO Air police fighters recognized the Russian Federation (RF) aircraft AN-12, which was operating in international airspace over the Baltic Sea from RF Kaliningrad to the RF mainland. AN-12, without a functioning radar transponder, had a flight plan with the regional Air Traffic Control Centre (RSVC) supported by radio.



    On 30 May, NATO'S Air Police fighters recognized two RF aircraft WITH-24 and two aircraft WITH-27 that had been in international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. The aircraft was flew without operating radar transponders, had no flight plans, no RSVC radio communication was supported. He also identified AN RF aircraft AN-12 which flew through AN international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. AN AN-12 flew without a functioning radar transponder, had a flight plan, a radio connection with RSVC supported.



    On 30 May, NATO Air police fighters identified RF aircraft AN AN-12, which was operating in the international airspace over the Baltic Sea from the RF Kaliningrad region to the RF mainland. AN-12 flew without a functioning radar transponder, had a flight plan with RSVC supported radio communication.



    On the 31st of May, NATO Air Police fighters identified an RF aircraft WITH-24, which had an international airspace from the Kaliningrad area and back. The aircraft was flying without a functioning radar transponder, did not have a flight plan, did not support the RSVC radio communication.



    On the 31st of May, NATO Air Police fighters recognised the RF aircraft IL-20, which was operating in an international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. The IL-20 did not have a flight plan without a functioning radar transponder with the RSVC supported radio communication.



    On 1 June, NATO Air Police fighters recognized two RF aircraft with a-27B who had had an international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. The aircraft was flew without operating radar transponders, had no flight plans, no RSVC radio communication was supported.






    06.03 – 06.09.


    [​IMG]

    From 3 to 9 June, the NATO Air police functions in the Baltic States on six occasions to recognise and accompany the Russian Federation (RF) military aircraft in the international area over the Baltic Sea.



    On 4 June, NATO Air Police fighters recognized the RF aircraft IL-20 as an international airspace from RF in the Kaliningrad region to the RF mainland. The IL-20, without a functioning radar transponder, had a flight plan with the regional Air Traffic Control Centre (RSVC) supported by radio.



    On 4 June, NATO Air Police fighters recognised the RF aircraft on the IL-20 international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad realm. The IL-20 did not have a flight plan without a functioning radar transponder with the RSVC supported radio communication.



    On 5 June, NATO Air Police fighters recognized the RF aircraft IL-18 as an international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. An IL-18 flew without a functioning radar transponder, had a flight plan with RSVC supported radio communication.



    On 6 June, NATO Air Police fighters recognized the RF aircraft IL-20 as an international airspace from RF in the Kaliningrad region to the RF mainland. The IL-20 did not have a flight plan without a functioning radar transponder with the RSVC supported radio communication.



    On 6 June, NATO Air Police fighters recognized RF aircraft IL-18 in the International space from RF Kaliningrad to the RF mainland. An IL-18 flew without a functioning radar transponder, had a flight plan with RSVC supported radio communication.



    On 6 June, NATO Air Police fighters recognised the RF aircraft IL-20, which was operating under international airspace from the RF mainland to the Kaliningrad Oblast. The IL-20 did not have a flight plan without a functioning radar transponder with the RSVC supported radio communication.
     
  18. Terminator

    Terminator Well-Known Member

    Russian MoD shares the 'pilot’s view' of Su-27 'escorting' two US and Swedish reconnaissance aircraft

    Russian Aviaton » Tuesday June 11, 2019 18:32 MSK

    Moscow scrambled a Su-27 fighter jet to closely tail US and Swedish reconnaissance aircraft as they headed towards Russian airspace above the Baltic Sea.
    The MoD also shared the ‘pilot’s view’ of the escort.

    The Russian jet was scrambled on Monday in response to the aircraft approaching the nation’s airspace above the Baltic Sea.


     
  19. Terminator

    Terminator Well-Known Member

    The Royal Air Force pilots took off with their Typhoons once again from Eesti õhuvägi Air Base at Ämari for a routine intercept of Russian transport aircraft. Under NATO's Baltic Air Policing mission their peacetime routine mission is to meet and escort aircraft that fly near Alliance airspace without proper identification, flight plan or radio contact with civilian Air Traffic Controllers.

    https://www.raf.mod.uk/news/article...O5_j-4ViPwb4_0PYa4nKI90CDD58sK9bTfgBsggCnt114


     
  20. Terminator

    Terminator Well-Known Member




    06.10–06.16.

    On June 10 – 16 NATO fighter aircraft conducting the NATO Air Policing Mission in the Baltic states were scrambled six times to identify and escort military aircraft of the Russian Federation in international airspace over the Baltic Sea.



    On June 10 NATO air policing fighter aircraft intercepted one AN-24 flying from Kaliningrad to mainland Russia. The AN-24 had its onboard transponder switched on but malfunctioning, it was flying according to a pre-filed flight plan and maintained radio communication with the regional air traffic control centre. The NATO fight aircraft also identified one AN-26 flying from Kaliningrad to mainland Russia with its onboard transponder on, according to a flight plan, and maintaining the radio contact.



    On June 13 NATO fighter jets intercepted one IL-20 flying from Kaliningrad to the mainland of the Russian Federation with its onboard transponder off, according to a pre-filed flight plan, without maintaining radio communication.



    On June 14 NATO air policing fighter aircraft intercepted two SU-24s flying from and back to Kaliningrad with their onboard transponders off, without the flight plans, without maintaining radio communication.



    On June 14 NATO fighter aircraft carried out an alert scramble to intercept a SU-35 flying from mainland Russia to Kaliningrad with its onboard transponder off, without the flight plan, without keeping radio contact.



    On June 15 NATO fighter jets intercepted two SU-24s flying from and back to Kaliningrad with their onboard transponders off, without the flight plans, without maintaining radio communication.



    On June 15 NATO fight aircraft intercepted one IL-76 and one SU-35 flying from Kliningrad to mainland Russia. The IL-76 had its onboard transponder on, maintained radio communication, but did not have the flight plan. The SU-35 shad its onboard transponder off, did not have the flight plan, and did not keep radio communication.
     

Ezen oldal megosztása