gtkkxm2wyaapk6f-webp.530156
gtkks3zwsaaf_sj-webp.530153
 
The San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea was adopted in June 1994 by the International Institute of Humanitarian Law ...

The manual is not a treaty but rather a set of guidelines developed by legal and naval experts.
The San Remo Manual serves as a guide for understanding and applying international law in naval conflicts
 
  • Tetszik
Reactions: Kim Philby
The San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea was adopted in June 1994 by the International Institute of Humanitarian Law ...

The manual is not a treaty but rather a set of guidelines developed by legal and naval experts.
The San Remo Manual serves as a guide for understanding and applying international law in naval conflicts
SECTION V: NEUTRAL MERCHANT VESSELS AND CIVIL AIRCRAFTNeutral merchant vessels

67. Merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States may not be attacked unless they:
(a) are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and afterprior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, searchor capture;
(b) engage in belligerent acts on behalf of the enemy;
(c) act as auxiliaries to the enemy s armed forces;
(d) are incorporated into or assist the enemy s intelligence system;
(e) sail under convoy of enemy warships or military aircraft; or
(f) otherwise make an effective contribution to the enemy s military action, e.g., by carrying militarymaterials, and it is not feasible for the attacking forces to first place passengers and crew in a place ofsafety. Unless circumstances do not permit, they are to be given a warning, so that they can re-route,off-load, or take other precautions.

68. Any attack on these vessels is subject to the basic rules in paragraphs 38-46.
69. The mere fact that a neutral merchant vessel is armed provides no grounds for attacking it

In 2011 the UN-Secretary-General's Panel of Inquiry came to the conclusion that the Gaza blockade had been "imposed as a legitimate security measure", and that the flotilla should not have acted in a way that escalated the potential for conflict.
 
éjszaka az Alexandroni dd több Hamasz célpontott tartóztatott le Szíriában
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
SECTION V: NEUTRAL MERCHANT VESSELS AND CIVIL AIRCRAFTNeutral merchant vessels

67. Merchant vessels flying the flag of neutral States may not be attacked unless they:
(a) are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and afterprior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, searchor capture;
(b) engage in belligerent acts on behalf of the enemy;
(c) act as auxiliaries to the enemy s armed forces;
(d) are incorporated into or assist the enemy s intelligence system;
(e) sail under convoy of enemy warships or military aircraft; or
(f) otherwise make an effective contribution to the enemy s military action, e.g., by carrying militarymaterials, and it is not feasible for the attacking forces to first place passengers and crew in a place ofsafety. Unless circumstances do not permit, they are to be given a warning, so that they can re-route,off-load, or take other precautions.

68. Any attack on these vessels is subject to the basic rules in paragraphs 38-46.
69. The mere fact that a neutral merchant vessel is armed provides no grounds for attacking it

In 2011 the UN-Secretary-General's Panel of Inquiry came to the conclusion that the Gaza blockade had been "imposed as a legitimate security measure", and that the flotilla should not have acted in a way that escalated the potential for conflict.
Ennek mi köze van ahhoz, hogy amire hivatkozol az csak egy ajánlás?
 
hehe
Az egyiptomiak kiutasítottak több száz Hamas támogatót, akik Kairóba utaztak, hogy elérjék Gazát
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Olmert kimondta a frankót

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Az hogy ezek az ultra ultra ortodox zsidok eszeveszett banda es kozveszelyesek az nem kerdes. Azonban Iran is ott van a lista tetejen a tobb evtizedes eltokelt es kitarto "pusztuljon izrael" celjaval. Olmertnek ezert reszben (nem kis reszben ) igaza van de alapvetoen o is a politikai hatalomert teker. Ezert pedig Netanjahut kell neki utni nem a perzsakat.
 
79 éves

AFP__20250609__49PU9TB__v1__HighRes__FranceIsraelPalestinianDiplomacyPoliticsPortrai-e1749548793294-640x400.jpg

Former prime minister Ehud Olmert in Paris, France, on June 9, 2025. (STEPHANE DE SAKUTIN / AFP)
A kor semmit nem jelent. Az ami belul van az szamit lasd Putyin Trump. Egyik sem mai csibe. De ahogy mondtam Olmerte egyetertek abban hogy az ultra ortodoxok izrael egyik legnagyobb fenyegetese. Valami ritka elcseszett egy banda es ezt sok zsido is igy gondolja.
 
Ennek ára van, de megint kimanőverezte Netanja szülötte...
 
Just sayin:Izrael megtámadta Iránt. Megöltek több iráni katonai és atommal foglalkozó vezetőt.
De a júsa ártatlan...
Libanon
Mert ők így szokták
Irak felől...
A föld alá...
Irak felől...
Hamas
Más egén...
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • Hűha
Reactions: megazez