[BIZTPOL] Irán
- Téma indítója GrGLy
- Indítva
Elég komoly szerkezet ez a FLARIS LAR 1, a hatótávjának 2500km-t adnak meg a gyártók. 2M USD az ára, és legfőképp légitaxinak ajánlják. Itt a gyártó oldaláról egy video. Én nagy utazómagasságon csodálkoztam, mert ahhoz túlnyomásos levegőrendszer is kell, és az egész gép caklipakli csak 1,5t körül van, ami valljuk be összsúlynak elég kevés egy 10000m-en tartósan repülő szerkezetnek, ráadásul 5 fővel...
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2020/...-un-sanctions-that-do-not-exist.html#comments
U.S. Will Sanction Other Countries For Not Enforcing UN Sanctions That Do Not Exist
Yesterday U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo attempted to trigger the 'snapback' of UN sanctions against Iran. He failed.
The snapback option is part of the Dispute Resolution Mechanism that is laid out in article 36 and 37 of the nuclear deal with Iran. The UN Security Council adopted the deal in its resolution 2231. When the U.S. move was first announced we explained in detail why the it would fail and summarized:
Only participants of the deal can trigger the snapback process. The U.S. is no longer recognized as such a participant.
Before a snapback can occur there are actually formal processes in the 'Joint Commission' and in the UNSC which must be followed. Those processes will not happen because the other JCPOA and UNSC members will simply ignore a U.S. attempt to trigger them.
Other members of the deal could still do that though. But the Europeans are unlikely to take the U.S. side on this issue.
The legal argument the U.S. makes to claim a right to trigger the snapback sanctions is bizarre and it does not hold up.
Soon after Pompeo's announcement Russia, China and the EU3 countries Britain, France and Germany as well as Iran rejected the U.S. move. EU High Representative Josep Borrell, who coordinates the Joint Commission that supervises the nuclear deal, declared the U.S. move to be null and void:
I take note of today’s announcement by the US regarding the so-called UN sanctions “snapback mechanism” under UN Security Council resolution 2231.
As I have repeatedly recalled, the US unilaterally ceased participation in the JCPOA by presidential Memorandum on 8 May 2018 and has subsequently not participated in any JCPOA-related activities. It cannot, therefore, be considered to be a JCPOA participant State for the purposes of possible sanctions snapback foreseen by the resolution.
Belgium, which is the UN Security Council "facilitator" of the residual UN sanctions on Iran under UNSC resolution 2231, also rejected the U.S. position.
Pompous may still try procedural tricks at the United Nations to somehow put the issue on the agenda. But other Security Council members are likely to find ways to prevent that.
This is the second time within a week that U.S. attempts against Iran at the United Nations were rejected. Last week the U.S. proposed to prolong an arms embargo against Iran. The current one will run out in October. The move failed:
The US has suffered a humiliating defeat at the United Nations as its proposal to extend an arms embargo on Iran won support from only the Dominican Republic at the security council vote.
The whole attempt to reintroduce sanctions under the nuclear deal has only one purpose:
The Trump administration is not seeking to restore U.N. sanctions because they want to preserve the JCPOA, because it has been their goal all along to kill the agreement and create a pretext for conflict.
The U.S. hopes to pressure Iran until it formally declares the deal dead. That could then give pretext for launching a larger conflict against the country. But as long as the other deal members hold up their commitments Iran is likely to stick to the deal.
The U.S. therefore swings the wreaking ball that it calls foreign policy against anyone who still supports the deal.
The U.S. will now pretend that its illegal move triggered the 30 days period that is foreseen in resolution 2231 before sanctions would come back. In 30 days it will pretend that the UN sanctions are back. After that the U.S. will sanctions those countries which ignore UN sanctions against Iran that do not exist:
The United States will not hesitate to impose sanctions on any nation that opposes its effort to "snapback" United Nations sanctions on Iran, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told "Special Report" Wednesday night.
"When we have seen any country violate our current sanctions, the current American sanctions, we have held every nation accountable for that," Pompeo told host Bret Baier. "We will do the same with respect to the broader U.N. Security Council sanctions as well."
I hope that the U.S. will follow through on this. The more it sanctions left and right for totally irrational reasons the more incentives will other countries have to build mechanisms that make U.S. sanctions ineffective and useless. Russia has already done that and China to some extend. The Europeans should have done this long ago but are only now considering it seriously.
There are also counter measures that could and should be considered. A European tax on digital products would seriously hurt Google, Facebook, Ebay and other U.S. companies. When their profits and stocks drop the Trump administration might learn that wreaking balls have the tendency to swing back.
Az elszabadult hajóágyú tipikus esete.
U.S. Will Sanction Other Countries For Not Enforcing UN Sanctions That Do Not Exist
Yesterday U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo attempted to trigger the 'snapback' of UN sanctions against Iran. He failed.
The snapback option is part of the Dispute Resolution Mechanism that is laid out in article 36 and 37 of the nuclear deal with Iran. The UN Security Council adopted the deal in its resolution 2231. When the U.S. move was first announced we explained in detail why the it would fail and summarized:
Only participants of the deal can trigger the snapback process. The U.S. is no longer recognized as such a participant.
Before a snapback can occur there are actually formal processes in the 'Joint Commission' and in the UNSC which must be followed. Those processes will not happen because the other JCPOA and UNSC members will simply ignore a U.S. attempt to trigger them.
Other members of the deal could still do that though. But the Europeans are unlikely to take the U.S. side on this issue.
The legal argument the U.S. makes to claim a right to trigger the snapback sanctions is bizarre and it does not hold up.
Soon after Pompeo's announcement Russia, China and the EU3 countries Britain, France and Germany as well as Iran rejected the U.S. move. EU High Representative Josep Borrell, who coordinates the Joint Commission that supervises the nuclear deal, declared the U.S. move to be null and void:
I take note of today’s announcement by the US regarding the so-called UN sanctions “snapback mechanism” under UN Security Council resolution 2231.
As I have repeatedly recalled, the US unilaterally ceased participation in the JCPOA by presidential Memorandum on 8 May 2018 and has subsequently not participated in any JCPOA-related activities. It cannot, therefore, be considered to be a JCPOA participant State for the purposes of possible sanctions snapback foreseen by the resolution.
Belgium, which is the UN Security Council "facilitator" of the residual UN sanctions on Iran under UNSC resolution 2231, also rejected the U.S. position.
Pompous may still try procedural tricks at the United Nations to somehow put the issue on the agenda. But other Security Council members are likely to find ways to prevent that.
This is the second time within a week that U.S. attempts against Iran at the United Nations were rejected. Last week the U.S. proposed to prolong an arms embargo against Iran. The current one will run out in October. The move failed:
The US has suffered a humiliating defeat at the United Nations as its proposal to extend an arms embargo on Iran won support from only the Dominican Republic at the security council vote.
The whole attempt to reintroduce sanctions under the nuclear deal has only one purpose:
The Trump administration is not seeking to restore U.N. sanctions because they want to preserve the JCPOA, because it has been their goal all along to kill the agreement and create a pretext for conflict.
The U.S. hopes to pressure Iran until it formally declares the deal dead. That could then give pretext for launching a larger conflict against the country. But as long as the other deal members hold up their commitments Iran is likely to stick to the deal.
The U.S. therefore swings the wreaking ball that it calls foreign policy against anyone who still supports the deal.
The U.S. will now pretend that its illegal move triggered the 30 days period that is foreseen in resolution 2231 before sanctions would come back. In 30 days it will pretend that the UN sanctions are back. After that the U.S. will sanctions those countries which ignore UN sanctions against Iran that do not exist:
The United States will not hesitate to impose sanctions on any nation that opposes its effort to "snapback" United Nations sanctions on Iran, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told "Special Report" Wednesday night.
"When we have seen any country violate our current sanctions, the current American sanctions, we have held every nation accountable for that," Pompeo told host Bret Baier. "We will do the same with respect to the broader U.N. Security Council sanctions as well."
I hope that the U.S. will follow through on this. The more it sanctions left and right for totally irrational reasons the more incentives will other countries have to build mechanisms that make U.S. sanctions ineffective and useless. Russia has already done that and China to some extend. The Europeans should have done this long ago but are only now considering it seriously.
There are also counter measures that could and should be considered. A European tax on digital products would seriously hurt Google, Facebook, Ebay and other U.S. companies. When their profits and stocks drop the Trump administration might learn that wreaking balls have the tendency to swing back.
Az elszabadult hajóágyú tipikus esete.
Az egyik fórumon kérdésre kiderült nagy menyiségű titánt bányásznak és dolgoznak fel iránban, és elég nagy ásványkincsük van belőle. Ezek szerint új technológia+ötvözetek, pontosabb illesztések , nagyobb hőmérséklet nagyobb teljesitmény. Várható újabb motor termelése a bemutatott 2 után, RD33 clón termelés előtt.
A titán az egyik kulcs fém a jövőhöz. Az oroszok hatalmas készleten csücsülnek. Deee... szívesen adnak el dollárért, ha rendesen megfizetik az árát...
Allitolag anno vszbe nekunk is azert kellett a bauxitot szouba kuldenunk feldolgozni mert igen magas volt a titantartalma /termeszetesen csak az alu jott vissza /A titán az egyik kulcs fém a jövőhöz. Az oroszok hatalmas készleten csücsülnek. Deee... szívesen adnak el dollárért, ha rendesen megfizetik az árát...
Az USA lépett ki az iráni szerződésből, így nincs miért ugrálnia embargó ügyben, mondják az E3-ak.
Az USA az ENSZ BT-ben is nagyon egyedül maradt. De így is fenntartja a szankciókat. (magyarán: szeretné ráerőszakolni mindenkire)
Az USA az ENSZ BT-ben is nagyon egyedül maradt. De így is fenntartja a szankciókat. (magyarán: szeretné ráerőszakolni mindenkire)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Iran?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc^tfw">#Iran</a>'s Defense Minister, Brigadier General Amir Hatami, will travel to Moscow visit the international military-technical forum "Army-2020" exhibition and meet with Russian officials. <a href="https://t.co/JQhp3tXqiD">pic.twitter.com/JQhp3tXqiD</a></p>— Iran Military (@Iran_Military) <a href="
">August 22, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Az Oroszország és Irán közötti katonai együttműködés "új szintekre fog jutni"
https://www.almasdarnews.com/articl...etween-russia-and-iran-will-reach-new-levels/
https://www.almasdarnews.com/articl...etween-russia-and-iran-will-reach-new-levels/
Már rég a tettek mezejére kellett volna lépni szu-30sm gépeket nekik r-77-1 rakétával .
https://honvedelem.hu/hirek/washington-felfuggesztett-minden-katonai-segelyt-malinak.html
"Irán ki tudott nyerni adatokat a hadserege által január elején tévedésből lelőtt ukrán utasszállító repülőgép feketedobozaiból, például a pilótafülkében elhangzott beszélgetések egy részletét - jelentette be vasárnap az iráni polgári légiforgalmi hivatal."
"Irán ki tudott nyerni adatokat a hadserege által január elején tévedésből lelőtt ukrán utasszállító repülőgép feketedobozaiból, például a pilótafülkében elhangzott beszélgetések egy részletét - jelentette be vasárnap az iráni polgári légiforgalmi hivatal."
Az irániak már kuksizzák az S400-ast a fegyvervásáron
https://sputniknews.com/military/20...ainted-with-s-400-during-arms-expo-in-russia/
https://sputniknews.com/military/20...ainted-with-s-400-during-arms-expo-in-russia/
What should Iran buy from Russia in Oct? when the arms embargo expires.
Been thinking that the most cost effective weapon for Iran would be one or two squadrons of Mig31's.
Cheaper than Su-35 at $33M a unit. 2. Specialized super-fast, high altitude, long range interceptor, ideal for B2 or B52 bombers on Diego Garcia. It would certainly give the U.S. second thoughts about bombing targets deep inside Iran.
Posted by: Christian J. Chuba | Aug 24 2020 14:00 utc | 96
Érdekes gondolat, de lehet valami belőle?
Been thinking that the most cost effective weapon for Iran would be one or two squadrons of Mig31's.
Cheaper than Su-35 at $33M a unit. 2. Specialized super-fast, high altitude, long range interceptor, ideal for B2 or B52 bombers on Diego Garcia. It would certainly give the U.S. second thoughts about bombing targets deep inside Iran.
Posted by: Christian J. Chuba | Aug 24 2020 14:00 utc | 96
Érdekes gondolat, de lehet valami belőle?
https://sputniknews.com/military/20...plans-to-fight-s-400s-if-they-end-up-in-iran/
Egy régebbi elemzés: bevásárló kártya jóslatok: nézzük mi lesz ebből?
Egy régebbi elemzés: bevásárló kártya jóslatok: nézzük mi lesz ebből?
W
Wilson
Guest
Az a cirkáló rakéta egyáltalán nem új valójában az "új" Abu Mahdi rakéta nem más, mint a "Hoveyzeh" rakéta, amelyet Irán 2019. február 2-án mutatott be.
Nem csináltak mást csak átfestették
Irán ellen ENSZ fegyverembargó van érvényben, amely idén októberben jár le.Már rég a tettek mezejére kellett volna lépni szu-30sm gépeket nekik r-77-1 rakétával .
Irán sikeresen használta az orosz gyártmányú radart az amerikai F-35-ös gépek nyomon követésére
https://tass.com/world/1193281
https://tass.com/world/1193281
Ez csak egy kijelentés, amit semmivel sem támasztanak alá.
P
Pogány
Guest
Amennyiben az Egyesült Államok megállapodást szeretne kötni Iránnal, úgy először vissza kell térnie a 2015-ös hathatalmi atomalkuhoz, amelyből két éve kivonult - jelentette ki kedden Haszan Róháni iráni elnök.
Forrás: https://kuruc.info/r/4/217003/
Forrás: https://kuruc.info/r/4/217003/