[BIZTPOL] Amerikai Egyesült Államok, Kanada

Folyt.
TNT_Graphics_Web-01.jpg

Forrás:https://www.csis.org/analysis/escalating-terrorism-problem-united-states
Ne haragudj, de ez szerintem egy fals statisztika.
Ha egy fehér ember a néger szót kimondja, akkor bekerül a terrorista statiba, ha az antifa felgyújt egy várost, akkor az csak véleménynyilvánitás.
Ezeket a statisztikákat azért helyén kell kezelni.
Ennek alapján akkor vagy a legnagyobb veszélyben, ha fehér emberrel vagy, mégis akkor erőszakolódnak és halnak meg az emberek nagyobb %-ban mikor feketével találkoznak.

Eleve kérdés, hogy milyen szabályt állítok fel egy statisztika elkészítéséhez.
Ha azt mondom terrorizmus az amikor fegyvert használ valaki gyilkolás-megfélemlités miatt, viszont ha kamionnal hajt a tömegbe az közlekedési baleset, már torzul a statisztika.
 
Pont ezzel foglalkozok a hamarosan megjelenő következő cikkemben, íme egy kis ajánló belőle:


Nem véletlenül terjed egyre inkább az a mém mi szerint "America is a third world country with a Gucci belt" avagy Amerika egy harmadik világbeli ország Gucci övvel
Nos frissen meg is érkezett a cikk, tessék szépen fogyasztani. Előszóként leginkább csak magamat tudnám idézni:
"Amerika jelen helyzetét leginkább egy autós hasonlattal lehetne szemléltetni. Bár a felszínen a fényezés ép, alatta a karosszéria már rohad, és mire észrevesszük, túl késő lesz. A világot teljesen új helyzet elé állítja Amerika gyengülése."

https://moszkvater.com/a-hanyatlo-amerikai-birodalom/
 
"Sidney Powell, former federal prosecutor and current attorney to former Trump national security advisor General Michael Flynn, says she has evidence of a large scale plot involving US tech giants, the Dominion voting machine company, government officials and media giants to “steal” the election from Donald Trump."
..
"“We are talking about hundreds of thousands of votes. President Trump won this election in a landslide, it’s going to be irrefutable,” she insisted, adding that “there needs to be a massive criminal investigation and it’s going to affect millions of voters and elections”."
https://sputniknews.com/us/20201114...wyer-vows-to-prove-mass-vote-fraud-plot-soon/
 
  • Tetszik
Reactions: Nemerson
Ne haragudj, de ez szerintem egy fals statisztika.
Ha egy fehér ember a néger szót kimondja, akkor bekerül a terrorista statiba, ha az antifa felgyújt egy várost, akkor az csak véleménynyilvánitás.
Ezeket a statisztikákat azért helyén kell kezelni.
Bele kéne olvasni a linkbe.

The United States faces a growing terrorism problem that will likely worsen over the next year. Based on a CSIS data set of terrorist incidents, the most significant threat likely comes from white supremacists, though anarchists and religious extremists inspired by the Islamic State and al-Qaeda could present a potential threat as well. Over the rest of 2020, the terrorist threat in the United States will likely rise based on several factors, including the November 2020 presidential election.

On June 3, 2020, federal authorities arrested three individuals allegedly associated with the “boogaloo” movement, a loosely-organized group of extremists preparing for a civil war, for conspiring to cause violence in Las Vegas and possessing an improvised incendiary device.1 Less than a week later, law enforcement officials near Richmond, VA, arrested Harry H. Rogers, a member of the Ku Klux Klan, for driving a vehicle into peaceful protesters. Around the same time, members of a Brooklyn anarchist group urged its supporters to conduct “rebellion” against the government. Extremists from all sides flooded social media with disinformation, conspiracy theories, and incitements to violence in response to the protests following the death of George Floyd, swamping Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, and other platforms.

This CSIS brief examines the state of terrorism in the United States. It asks two sets of questions. First, what are the most significant types of terrorism in the United States, and how has the terrorism threat in the U.S. homeland evolved over time? Second, what are the implications for terrorism over the next year? To answer these questions, this analysis compiles and analyzes an original data set of 893 terrorist plots and attacks in the United States between January 1994 and May 2020.
 
"Based on a CSIS data set of terrorist incidents, the most significant threat likely comes from white supremacists"
A fehér felsőbbrendűség és ehhez kapcsolódó terrorista veszély az aztán valós veszély. Ti nem normálisak! Ezt az ótvaros, fehérellenes, rasszista, kommunista propganadát toljátok egyfolytában.

Takarítsa már el valaki ezt a két hulladékot!
 
Ebből blokád lesz!
Semmi nem lesz.
Még mindig nem látják elegen a valós veszélyt, az is kérdéses, hogy valaha látni fogják e.
Szerintem nem.


"Based on a CSIS data set of terrorist incidents, the most significant threat likely comes from white supremacists"
A fehér felsőbbrendűség és ehhez kapcsolódó terrorista veszély az aztán valós veszély. Ti nem normálisak! Ezt az ótvaros, fehérellenes, rasszista, kommunista propganadát toljátok egyfolytában.

Takarítsa már el valaki ezt a két hulladékot!
Nem fogják. Van valami elfuserált megfelelési kényszerük, azt hiszik ez így helyes.
---
 
Na, egy ilyen szcenárió olaj lenne a tűzre!
..
“There are deadlines by which the state must appoint its electors and must get those certificates into Congress to be counted. Now, one of the things that could happen and it’s allowed by federal law is if the election is still in limbo, a state legislature can say, ‘Okay, this election’s a mess, we are going to assume our responsibility and we are going to appoint electors.’ State legislators have final authority on who those electors are, that then go and vote,” Paul further added.
..
In multiple states where most media outlets have called for a narrow win for Biden, the state legislatures are controlled by Republicans. That includes Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Georgia."
https://www.ntd.com/how-state-lawmakers-may-make-trump-win_528152.html
 
  • Tetszik
Reactions: Nemerson
Takarítsa már el valaki ezt a két hulladékot!
Waaaaaahhhhh!!! Feels > Reals!!!!!5

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

DEFINITIONS
This analysis focuses on terrorism: the deliberate use—or threat—of violence by non-state actors in order to achieve political goals and create a broad psychological impact.4 Violence—and the threat of violence—are important components of terrorism. Overall, this analysis divides terrorism into four broad categories: right-wing, left-wing, religious, and ethnonationalist.5 To be clear, terms like right-wing and left-wing terrorism do not—in any way—correspond to mainstream political parties in the United States, such as the Republican and Democratic parties, which eschew terrorism. Instead, terrorism is orchestrated by a small minority of extremists.

First, right-wing terrorism refers to the use or threat of violence by sub-national or non-state entities whose goals may include racial or ethnic supremacy; opposition to government authority; anger at women, including from the incel (“involuntary celibate”) movement; and outrage against certain policies, such as abortion.6 This analysis uses the term “right-wing terrorism” rather than “racially- and ethnically-motivated violent extremism,” or REMVE, which is used by some in the U.S. government.7 Second, left-wing terrorism involves the use or threat of violence by sub-national or non-state entities that oppose capitalism, imperialism, and colonialism; pursue environmental or animal rights issues; espouse pro-communist or pro-socialist beliefs; or support a decentralized social and political system such as anarchism. Third, religious terrorism includes violence in support of a faith-based belief system, such as Islam, Judaism, Christianity, and Hinduism, among many others. As highlighted in the next section, the primary threat from religious terrorists comes from Salafi-jihadists inspired by the Islamic State and al-Qaeda. Fourth, ethnonationalist terrorism refers to violence in support of ethnic or nationalist goals—often struggles of self-determination and separatism along ethnic or nationalist lines.
(...)

ATTACKS AND PLOTS
Between 1994 and 2020, there were 893 terrorist attacks and plots in the United States. Overall, right-wing terrorists perpetrated the majority—57 percent—of all attacks and plots during this period, compared to 25 percent committed by left-wing terrorists, 15 percent by religious terrorists, 3 percent by ethnonationalists, and 0.7 percent by terrorists with other motives.

Figure 1 shows the proportion of attacks and plots attributed to the perpetrator ideologies each year during this period. Right-wing attacks and plots were predominant from 1994 to 1999 and accounted for more than half of all incidents in 2008 as well as every year since 2011, with the exception of 2013. Most right-wing attacks in the 1990s targeted abortion clinics, while most right-wing attacks since 2014 focused on individuals (often targeted because of religion, race, or ethnicity) and religious institutions. Facilities and individuals related to the government and police have also been consistent right-wing targets throughout the period, particularly for attacks by militia and sovereign citizen groups.