[BIZTPOL] Amerikai Egyesült Államok, Kanada

[jurgenbauer]

Biden szoftverét upgradelték. Egy beszéd után már képes több láthatatlan embernek is kezet nyújtani....

Lehet, hogy vele akart kezet fogni?

 

[Allesmor Obranna]

Elég travisan néz ki...

A legtöbb corporate cégnél a HR-esek ilyen mesterkélt mimikájú, mániákus szociopaták.
Nekem volt már dolgom olyan HR menedzserrel, aki behívott az irodájába, nagy (teljesen helyzetidegen) széles mosollyal köszöntött, hogy közölje velem, szóbeli figyelmeztetést kapok, aminek nem lesz írásos nyoma, mert amiért figyelmeztet, arról nem tehetek, majd minden átmenet nélkül odafordult a gépéhez és elkezdett dalolászva valakivel chatelni.
Sziaaaaa! - közölte majd mehettem ki az irodából.

 

[Nemerson]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520713806086696960

Biden csak a frontember. Obama, április 21.: a közösségi média cenzorai "nem mennek elég messzire", ezért a kormánynak kell közbelépnie, hogy elvégezze a munkát. Hat nappal később a Belbiztonsági Hivatal létrehozza az "Igazság Minisztériumot" (más néven a dezinformációs irányító testületet).

 

[kamm]

"A Brief Note on the "Gentlemen's Agreement", Which is Not Just for Defense Lobbyists
TV analysts from all sorts of industries are identified by long-ago official titles, not current lobbying gigs
Matt Taibbi
Apr 26

In reply to the many comments and questions received about Matt Orfalea’s brutal “Weapons” mashup released this morning (and re-posted above), a quick note:

As some readers correctly pointed out, defense is only the most conspicuous example of the phenomenon in which TV news programs identify guests by illustrious past official titles, and not by their current lobbying ties or positions on corporate boards. This happens in most every industry, from health care to big Pharma to energy to Big Tech and beyond.

It’s easy to find examples. FAIR co-founder Jeff Cohen, when he wrote about this a few years back, cited CNN’s Don Lemon bringing on “former Obama campaign manager Jim Messina” to talk about why the Bernie Sanders Medicare for All proposal “will scare swing voters and scare Democrats.” Lemon and CNN never let on that Messina’s more recent job at the aptly-named Messina Group made him a de facto spokesperson for corporations like Google, Uber, Delta, and other companies with whom Sanders had tangled.

We saw similar patterns of non-disclosure throughout the pandemic. Below, CNN host Brianna Keilar does a segment about how “The FDA has offered a booster dose for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine,” then brings on former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb to discuss the subject, not mentioning — on air, anyway — that he’s a current Pfizer board member. Even print treatments don’t always bring up Gottlieb’s corporate job, although outlets like CBS and NPR have done better with this of late."

A Brief Note on the "Gentlemen's Agreement", Which is Not Just for Defense Lobbyists
TV analysts from all sorts of industries are identified by long-ago official titles, not current lobbying gigs
Matt Taibbi
Apr 26
578
183

In reply to the many comments and questions received about Matt Orfalea’s brutal “Weapons” mashup released this morning (and re-posted above), a quick note:

As some readers correctly pointed out, defense is only the most conspicuous example of the phenomenon in which TV news programs identify guests by illustrious past official titles, and not by their current lobbying ties or positions on corporate boards. This happens in most every industry, from health care to big Pharma to energy to Big Tech and beyond.

It’s easy to find examples. FAIR co-founder Jeff Cohen, when he wrote about this a few years back, cited CNN’s Don Lemon bringing on “former Obama campaign manager Jim Messina” to talk about why the Bernie Sanders Medicare for All proposal “will scare swing voters and scare Democrats.” Lemon and CNN never let on that Messina’s more recent job at the aptly-named Messina Group made him a de facto spokesperson for corporations like Google, Uber, Delta, and other companies with whom Sanders had tangled.

We saw similar patterns of non-disclosure throughout the pandemic. Below, CNN host Brianna Keilar does a segment about how “The FDA has offered a booster dose for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine,” then brings on former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb to discuss the subject, not mentioning — on air, anyway — that he’s a current Pfizer board member. Even print treatments don’t always bring up Gottlieb’s corporate job, although outlets like CBS and NPR have done better with this of late."

"The disclosure issue sounds like a minor ethical issue in journalism, but gets to the heart of a big problem in American politics, namely that crucial policy decisions at every level are influenced by the promise of life-changing money somewhere down the line. Bank regulators and securities enforcement officials may hesitate in enforcement roles, knowing a private sector job worth millions or billions (yes, billions) could be waiting, so long as they don’t play too rough with investigatory targets."

"Now, a new variable has been introduced: the TV network that allows ex-officials to take jobs as lobbyists and sign on for paid on-air contributor gigs at the same time. These incentives influence the in-office behavior of officials, but also the public commentary such people give after leaving. Now, if you know where the financial rewards are, it’s not hard for any politician to build public positions in advance to maximize the chances of catching those rewards later on."

 

[cirqle]

"A Brief Note on the "Gentlemen's Agreement", Which is Not Just for Defense Lobbyists
TV analysts from all sorts of industries are identified by long-ago official titles, not current lobbying gigs
Matt Taibbi
Apr 26

In reply to the many comments and questions received about Matt Orfalea’s brutal “Weapons” mashup released this morning (and re-posted above), a quick note:

As some readers correctly pointed out, defense is only the most conspicuous example of the phenomenon in which TV news programs identify guests by illustrious past official titles, and not by their current lobbying ties or positions on corporate boards. This happens in most every industry, from health care to big Pharma to energy to Big Tech and beyond.

It’s easy to find examples. FAIR co-founder Jeff Cohen, when he wrote about this a few years back, cited CNN’s Don Lemon bringing on “former Obama campaign manager Jim Messina” to talk about why the Bernie Sanders Medicare for All proposal “will scare swing voters and scare Democrats.” Lemon and CNN never let on that Messina’s more recent job at the aptly-named Messina Group made him a de facto spokesperson for corporations like Google, Uber, Delta, and other companies with whom Sanders had tangled.

We saw similar patterns of non-disclosure throughout the pandemic. Below, CNN host Brianna Keilar does a segment about how “The FDA has offered a booster dose for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine,” then brings on former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb to discuss the subject, not mentioning — on air, anyway — that he’s a current Pfizer board member. Even print treatments don’t always bring up Gottlieb’s corporate job, although outlets like CBS and NPR have done better with this of late."

A Brief Note on the "Gentlemen's Agreement", Which is Not Just for Defense Lobbyists
TV analysts from all sorts of industries are identified by long-ago official titles, not current lobbying gigs
Matt Taibbi
Apr 26
578
183

In reply to the many comments and questions received about Matt Orfalea’s brutal “Weapons” mashup released this morning (and re-posted above), a quick note:

As some readers correctly pointed out, defense is only the most conspicuous example of the phenomenon in which TV news programs identify guests by illustrious past official titles, and not by their current lobbying ties or positions on corporate boards. This happens in most every industry, from health care to big Pharma to energy to Big Tech and beyond.

It’s easy to find examples. FAIR co-founder Jeff Cohen, when he wrote about this a few years back, cited CNN’s Don Lemon bringing on “former Obama campaign manager Jim Messina” to talk about why the Bernie Sanders Medicare for All proposal “will scare swing voters and scare Democrats.” Lemon and CNN never let on that Messina’s more recent job at the aptly-named Messina Group made him a de facto spokesperson for corporations like Google, Uber, Delta, and other companies with whom Sanders had tangled.

We saw similar patterns of non-disclosure throughout the pandemic. Below, CNN host Brianna Keilar does a segment about how “The FDA has offered a booster dose for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine,” then brings on former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb to discuss the subject, not mentioning — on air, anyway — that he’s a current Pfizer board member. Even print treatments don’t always bring up Gottlieb’s corporate job, although outlets like CBS and NPR have done better with this of late."

"The disclosure issue sounds like a minor ethical issue in journalism, but gets to the heart of a big problem in American politics, namely that crucial policy decisions at every level are influenced by the promise of life-changing money somewhere down the line. Bank regulators and securities enforcement officials may hesitate in enforcement roles, knowing a private sector job worth millions or billions (yes, billions) could be waiting, so long as they don’t play too rough with investigatory targets."

"Now, a new variable has been introduced: the TV network that allows ex-officials to take jobs as lobbyists and sign on for paid on-air contributor gigs at the same time. These incentives influence the in-office behavior of officials, but also the public commentary such people give after leaving. Now, if you know where the financial rewards are, it’s not hard for any politician to build public positions in advance to maximize the chances of catching those rewards later on."

Ez a videó nagyon jó. Egyben nagyon ijesztő
Ennyire nem kapnak mostanában megrendeléseket odaát, hogy a hoholokon keresztül kelljen elérni, hogy menjenek a gyárak??

 

[Allesmor Obranna]

"A Brief Note on the "Gentlemen's Agreement", Which is Not Just for Defense Lobbyists
TV analysts from all sorts of industries are identified by long-ago official titles, not current lobbying gigs
Matt Taibbi
Apr 26

In reply to the many comments and questions received about Matt Orfalea’s brutal “Weapons” mashup released this morning (and re-posted above), a quick note:

As some readers correctly pointed out, defense is only the most conspicuous example of the phenomenon in which TV news programs identify guests by illustrious past official titles, and not by their current lobbying ties or positions on corporate boards. This happens in most every industry, from health care to big Pharma to energy to Big Tech and beyond.

It’s easy to find examples. FAIR co-founder Jeff Cohen, when he wrote about this a few years back, cited CNN’s Don Lemon bringing on “former Obama campaign manager Jim Messina” to talk about why the Bernie Sanders Medicare for All proposal “will scare swing voters and scare Democrats.” Lemon and CNN never let on that Messina’s more recent job at the aptly-named Messina Group made him a de facto spokesperson for corporations like Google, Uber, Delta, and other companies with whom Sanders had tangled.

We saw similar patterns of non-disclosure throughout the pandemic. Below, CNN host Brianna Keilar does a segment about how “The FDA has offered a booster dose for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine,” then brings on former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb to discuss the subject, not mentioning — on air, anyway — that he’s a current Pfizer board member. Even print treatments don’t always bring up Gottlieb’s corporate job, although outlets like CBS and NPR have done better with this of late."

A Brief Note on the "Gentlemen's Agreement", Which is Not Just for Defense Lobbyists
TV analysts from all sorts of industries are identified by long-ago official titles, not current lobbying gigs
Matt Taibbi
Apr 26
578
183

In reply to the many comments and questions received about Matt Orfalea’s brutal “Weapons” mashup released this morning (and re-posted above), a quick note:

As some readers correctly pointed out, defense is only the most conspicuous example of the phenomenon in which TV news programs identify guests by illustrious past official titles, and not by their current lobbying ties or positions on corporate boards. This happens in most every industry, from health care to big Pharma to energy to Big Tech and beyond.

It’s easy to find examples. FAIR co-founder Jeff Cohen, when he wrote about this a few years back, cited CNN’s Don Lemon bringing on “former Obama campaign manager Jim Messina” to talk about why the Bernie Sanders Medicare for All proposal “will scare swing voters and scare Democrats.” Lemon and CNN never let on that Messina’s more recent job at the aptly-named Messina Group made him a de facto spokesperson for corporations like Google, Uber, Delta, and other companies with whom Sanders had tangled.

We saw similar patterns of non-disclosure throughout the pandemic. Below, CNN host Brianna Keilar does a segment about how “The FDA has offered a booster dose for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine,” then brings on former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb to discuss the subject, not mentioning — on air, anyway — that he’s a current Pfizer board member. Even print treatments don’t always bring up Gottlieb’s corporate job, although outlets like CBS and NPR have done better with this of late."

"The disclosure issue sounds like a minor ethical issue in journalism, but gets to the heart of a big problem in American politics, namely that crucial policy decisions at every level are influenced by the promise of life-changing money somewhere down the line. Bank regulators and securities enforcement officials may hesitate in enforcement roles, knowing a private sector job worth millions or billions (yes, billions) could be waiting, so long as they don’t play too rough with investigatory targets."

"Now, a new variable has been introduced: the TV network that allows ex-officials to take jobs as lobbyists and sign on for paid on-air contributor gigs at the same time. These incentives influence the in-office behavior of officials, but also the public commentary such people give after leaving. Now, if you know where the financial rewards are, it’s not hard for any politician to build public positions in advance to maximize the chances of catching those rewards later on."

Mesés! Én még több fegyvert adnék a még több fegyver mellé.

 

[enzo]

A legtöbb amcsi nőnek fura fejszerkezete van. Valószínűleg ugyanazért, amiért az amcsi férfiaknak: a sok hormonokkal teletömött kaja miatt.

Vagy csak az 5 ezer év. Bocs, elhatárolódok magamtól.

 

[Veér Ispán]

Hány ország ment polgárháborúba hogy egy kisebbségnek segítsen?

egy sem.

 

[Serathis]

Vagy csak az 5 ezer év. Bocs, elhatárolódok magamtól.

Bárcsak nekem lenne ilyen masszív jawline

 

[Veér Ispán]

Nem, szerintem a "megbukást" is eltörlik majd (vagy sokkal lazábban kezelik - pláne, ha "sokszínű" vagy). Ahogy a felvételit meg az osztályzatokat.

Itt inkább a munkaerőpiacon lehet gond, hogy a papír - meg az is, hogy hol szerezted (mármint országon belül) - nemigazán fog jelenteni semmit. Majd lesznek sokfordulós készségfelmérők munkaerőfelvételkor. Bár, ha jobban belegondolunk az csak igazán a "kirekesztő" ...

Vannak már ilyenek, informatikában végtelen sokszor 5-10 körös felvételik egyes megakorpókhoz.

 

[Veér Ispán]

Azt felejtsd el ...

Egy UK fizette 2006 december 31 -ig, akit nem szórtak meg ennyire ... Aztán egy nyugat által lerabolt országnak, ami alapból egy hiperkorrupt mafiaállam ez hogy fog menni? Békeidőben sem álltak jól az államadóssággal meg annak növekedési ütemével. Aztán most mindezek mellé a masszív IMF meg egyéb hitelek is bejöttek időközben. Miközben a gazdaság meg zuhan, mint a kő meg milliók hagyják el az országot és az orosz még csak a keleti végeken van. Mi lesz, ha nyugatabbra is "körülnéz" ...

Amennyiben gonoszkodni szeretnék, akkor azt mondanám, hogy az oroszoknak fizetendő háborús jóvátételük mértékét sem tudjuk még ...

Az UK megmaradt a háború után. Ukranja akár még jogutód nélkül is eltűnhet.

 

[Serathis]

egy sem.

Akkor hazudtak az amcs polgárháborúról?! El se hiszem

 

[Ember]

Johnstone: "Ó, Istenem, ez még sokkal rosszabb lesz"
Ez a fontos pont egy kicsit elveszett a sűrűjében annak a személynek a teljesen hipnotikus nevetségessége miatt, akit kineveztek a Dezinformációs Irányító Testület vezetésére. Nina Jankowicz, egy gondosan ápolt mocsári teremtmény, aki egy Fulbright-ösztöndíj keretében Kijevben dolgozott az ukrán kormány kommunikációs tanácsadójaként, és akit széles körben kritizálnak a szakértők és a közösségi média felhasználói a virulens oroszellenességéért, és amiatt, hogy mi a fene ez:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1362153807879303171

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

A valóság lassan minden összeesküvés elméletnél húzósabb.

 

[Nemerson]

Tucker: Ezért visznek minket a demokraták háborúba Oroszországgal

 

[Pogány]

Régi fájdalma az amerikai mezőgazdaságnak, hogy Európa nem szívesen vásárol genetikailag módosított növényeket, ahogy a hormonkezelt amerikai marhahúst is elutasítja. A Bloomberg szerint az ukrajnai háború most majd arra készteti a vállalatokat, hogy a napraforgóolaj alternatívái felé forduljanak, és a kereskedelmi forgalomban bekövetkező változás valószínűleg a kukoricára is kiterjed, amelyet elsősorban állati takarmányként használnak. Eddig az Európai Unió importjának mintegy felét az Ukrajnából származó nem génmódosított kukorica tette ki.
Forrás: https://kuruc.info/r/4/243091/

 

[Serathis]

Ja igen. Megszellőztették a SCOTUS Roe v Wayde tervezetét. Kitört az abortuszpánik, Szolgálólány Meséje, világvége, Ukrajna elfelejtve, 2000 Mules elhavazva, stb

 

[Septimus]

Ja igen. Megszellőztették a SCOTUS Roe v Wayde tervezetét. Kitört az abortuszpánik, Szolgálólány Meséje, világvége, Ukrajna elfelejtve, 2000 Mules elhavazva, stb

Igen, mert az abortusz tilalom "white supremacy" törekvés. Most örjöngenek a liberálisok a Twitter/TikTok felületen, hogy az abortusz elsősorban a fehér nők szokása, a fekete nők gond nélkül megszülik az 5-6 kölyköt 5-6 különböző apától. Ezért az abortusz tilalom egyértelműen "white supremacy", mert ezek a galád nácik ezzel akarják lassítani a fehérek népességcsökkenését. Ezért ezek csupaszív fehér (!!!) marxisták most azt kívánják a Twitteren, hogy a törvényhozók lányát erőszakolja meg és ejtse teherbe pár nigger.. Van itt elmebaj nem kevés..

 

[Ramzana]

Ja igen. Megszellőztették a SCOTUS Roe v Wayde tervezetét. Kitört az abortuszpánik, Szolgálólány Meséje, világvége, Ukrajna elfelejtve, 2000 Mules elhavazva, stb

A Szolgálólány Meséjéről a mai napig nem értem, hogy nem a celebek vásárolt gyerekei meg a béranya-üzlet ugrik be mindenkinek, miért a családtámogatás.

 

[Nemerson]

Az USA kereskedelmi deficitje márciusban rekordmagasra emelkedett

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[SilvioD]

Amerikai pénzügyminiszter: Mégsem érdemes belemenni a szankciózásba, belerokkanhat Európa

Janet Yellen óvatosságra szólította fel az EU-t az orosz energiaipari tilalommal kapcsolatban még április végén, mert szerinte ez az egész világot válságba taszíthatná.

Mandiner

makronom.mandiner.hu