Nemrégiben azt olvastam, a NATO szerződés 5. cikkely - kölcsönös segítségnyújtás - csak az atlanti térségre vonatkozik.
Afganisztánt elég bajos ennek nevezni.
Szóval, mit kerestünk mi Afganisztánban mint NATO szövetséges?
Hulyesegeket olvastal. Probalj meg guglizni.
The principle of collective defence is at the very heart of NATO’s founding treaty. It remains a unique and enduring principle that binds its members together, committing them to protect each other and setting a spirit of solidarity within the Alliance.
www.nato.int
Article 5
“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.
Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.”
Azaz a tamadasrol van szo, ha az eri oket Europaban vagy Eszak-Amerikaban (=otthon), a "North Atlantic area" (itt: a NATO tagok teruletei) meg csak egy extra kitetel arra vonatkozoan, hogy sajat/egymas teruletukon is bevethetik a NATO eroit, ha vissza kell foglalni/biztositani kell a beket.
De van tovabb is, ki is bontja a tamadas definiciojat:
Article 6
“For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:
- on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France 2, on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
- on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.”
Magyaran ha egyszedr a V ervenybe lepett, barhol es barmilyen formaban fellephet
nek a tagok. Csak
nek, mert anno (49-ben?) az europaiak, a szovjetektol felve minden vedelmet automatikusra akartak irni, de amerikaiak nem akartak
mindent bevallalni Europaban, ezert a szorozos szovegezes.
Mert a magyar kormány persze dönthet úgy, hogy segít, csak akkor ez a NATO-tól független dolog.
Nem, nem az. Hulyeseget magyarazol.
Nem, nem az.
és nem szövetségesi kötelezettség.
De, de bezony az.
FYI ez a ciganytempo, hogy alairok egy szovetseget, aztan valogatok, mikor segitek, de azt elvarom, hogy nekem viszont barmikor jojjenek, na az ezen a szinten nem mukodik.