Vajon volt egy ukrán szuró viking aki visszavonta a technikát és az embereket a túloldalra?
Vajon mennyi ukrán ragadt a folyó és az orosz vonalak között?
[HÍREK] Ukrajnai fegyveres konfliktus
- Téma indítója GrGLy
- Indítva
-
Ha nem vagy kibékülve az alapértelmezettnek beállított sötét sablonnal, akkor a korábbi ígéretnek megfelelően bármikor átválthatsz a korábbi világos színekkel dolgozó kinézetre.
Ehhez görgess a lap aljára és a baloldalon keresd a HTKA Dark feliratú gombot. Kattints rá, majd a megnyíló ablakban válaszd a HTKA Light lehetőséget. Választásod a böngésződ elmenti cookie-ba, így amikor legközelebb érkezel ezt a műveletsort nem kell megismételned. -
Az elmúlt időszak tapasztalatai alapján házirendet kapott a topic.
Ezen témában - a fórumon rendhagyó módon - az oldal üzemeltetője saját álláspontja, meggyőződése alapján nem enged bizonyos véleményeket, mivel meglátása szerint az káros a járványhelyzet enyhítését célzó törekvésekre.
Kérünk, hogy a vírus veszélyességét kétségbe vonó, oltásellenes véleményed más platformon fejtsd ki. Nálunk ennek nincs helye. Az ilyen hozzászólásokért 1 alkalommal figyelmeztetés jár, majd folytatása esetén a témáról letiltás. Arra is kérünk, hogy a fórum más témáiba ne vigyétek át, mert azért viszont már a fórum egészéről letiltás járhat hosszabb-rövidebb időre.
-
Az elmúlt időszak tapasztalatai alapján frissített házirendet kapott a topic.
--- VÁLTOZÁS A MODERÁLÁSBAN ---
A források, hírek preferáltak. Azoknak, akik veszik a fáradságot és összegyűjtik ezeket a főként harcokkal, a háború jelenlegi állásával és haditechnika szempontjából érdekes híreket, (mindegy milyen oldali) forrásokkal alátámasztják és bonuszként legalább a címet egy google fordítóba berakják, azoknak ismételten köszönjük az áldozatos munkáját és további kitartást kívánunk nekik!
Ami nem a topik témájába vág vagy akár csak erősebb hangnemben is kerül megfogalmazásra, az valamilyen formában szankcionálva lesz
Minden olyan hozzászólásért ami nem hír, vagy szorosan a konfliktushoz kapcsolódó vélemény / elemzés azért instant 3 nap topic letiltás jár. Aki pedig ezzel trükközne és folytatná másik topicban annak 2 hónap fórum ban a jussa.
Vajon mennyi ukrán ragadt a folyó és az orosz vonalak között?
A Wagner rendszeresen csinált ilyen akciókat, Bakhmut ostromakor több kulcsfontosságú helyet is így tudtak elfoglalni.
"However, in my view, Russia is currently in its best place in half a century. Certainly in regard to the entire post-USSR period. The public morale, economy, societal solidarity and general political stability is absolutely at its highest.
The problem is, Russians are some of the least aware people of conditions in other countries particularly Europe and the West. This results in their perennial pessimism in comparing their conditions to the West. Many Russians will unfavorably compare themselves to Europe or complain about economic matters, low pay, high prices, inflation, etc., while not being cognizant of the fact that all these things are usually worse in most of the West.
In general, ever since Putin got rid of Western NGOs and other propaganda arms, the Russian society has been at its most firm and stable because there aren’t the usual CIA engineered social movements which destabilize every enemy society.
With Soros NGOs gone, Western media throttled, pernicious CIA-provocateurs masquerading as “diplomats” cutdown with major embassy/consul cutbacks, LGBT propaganda dialed down even more than before, as well as cultural shifts to, not deplatform per se, but cut down the reach of other “undesirable” elements of society, like for instance gangster rappers (the worst ones of which were shouldered out of Russia, forced to take refuge in Dubai, etc.). These things have created a much stable and uniform society where even the youthful generation is starting to grow up more culturally and historically aware and educated rather than indoctrinated by anti-Russian or Russophobic nonsense. Partly responsible have been new campaigns and initiatives to redesign curricula in schools which focus on telling correct history."
Mit is akartam mondani? Nahát!? Ismerős? Az.
Más.
"The one important point the article does bring up in allowing me to debunk it is the common trope about Russia’s ethnic regions being disproportionately affected by the war. It’s a repeated syllogism that pro-Ukrainians use to say that Russia is recruiting only from poor border regions, like Tuva, Altai, and Buryatia and that these regions have disproportionate losses compared to ‘cosmopolitan’ ethnic Russian districts like Moscow and St. Petersburg.
The issue is, this does happen but only as a natural consequence of the laws of economics. You see, poorer regions in every country typically have a higher percentage of people joining the military for the competitive pay and social benefits. Additionally, in Russia you get exempted from conscription—and therefore being a reservist who can be mobilized—for attending higher education institutes. In poorer regions, less people go to university and therefore less are exempt, which means a disproportionate amount of them end up in the reservist pool compared to Moscow where many of the cosmopolitans get out of service by virtue of attending graduate school at higher rates. This isn’t a “diabolical plot” of Putin’s, this is how simple socio-economics works."
(...)
"These people are extremely patriotic about the military, far more so per capita than the rich cosmopolitan regions who have more bourgeoisie things to worry about. In short, these people are proud to fight for Russia, and no amount of Western spin about their ‘disproportionate’ participation in the conflict can change that."
A tüzérségről:
"Let’s say hypothetically both sides fire 10,000 shells per day each. Let’s say all 10,000 of the ones Russia fires have a range of 30km. Now let’s say 9,000 of the ones Ukraine fires have a range of 20km, but 1,000 of Ukraine’s have a range of 40km.
Which side has the advantage?
It’s clear that for 90% of the firing, Russia will be outranging Ukraine, and inturn will be outranged in 10% of the cases. I’ve explained before that the standard M107 and M795 NATO rounds that Ukraine uses 98% of the times on their M777s has a shorter range than the standard OF45/61+ Russian rounds used on their 2A65s, 2A36s, etc.
The M777s are Ukraine’s bread and butter most numerous system (150-200). They received a few dozen French Caesars that can hit a tad farther with regular shells than Russia’s main bread and butter howitzers. However Russia has other ‘specialty’ systems like the 2S5 and 2S7s which can hit even farther than Caesars—and Russia has much more of those than Ukraine has of Caesars. So again, Ukraine is at a disadvantage.
Additionally, Russian Lancets now account for the majority of “counter-battery” kills and Ukraine has nothing to match that. Comparing asymmetrically we can say Ukraine has HIMARs which is doing what Russian Lancets are doing, just in a different way. Thus we can say they’re perhaps evenly matched in that one asymmetric subcategory. Though Russia has BM-30 Smerch which is superior to HIMARS in every way: much more powerful rocket of 300mm vs. 227mm, much greater range of 120km vs. 80km+. Russia simply hasn’t produced many GMLRS guided Smerch rockets until recently, but now there’s been an uptick of Russia reportedly using Smerch in the same manner as the HIMARs, long range guided sniping of rear assets—except Smerch packs a much larger punch.
That being said, just because Russia has the advantage or better systems doesn’t mean they can stop the systems Ukraine has. So as you’ve pointed out, the HIMARS has been having some successes, though it comes in spurts and lately it’s once again seems to have been neutralized.
Ukraine exaggerates the success of HIMARS by saving up about one month’s worth of footage, then releasing it all at once as a highlight reel that shows 4-5 spectacular hits at once. This gives the false impression that HIMARS is dominating the battlefield when in reality it’s the only success in weeks. The typical short memories and attention spans of most observers leaves them forgetting about the 3-4 week gaps in between those releases, where HIMARS are not seen doing anything. That’s because they have maybe one decent hit per week, and they save those up into a monthly reel. It’s just more Ukrainian sleight of hand tactics."
(...)
"Russia is forced to fight with hand behind its back as Ukrainian assets like HIMARS are able to freely use Western ISR while Russia can’t strike those ISR capabilities in the same way they would if there was an outright open war against the West. That’s why I’ve pointed out before that Ukraine currently enjoys far more advantages than the West/NATO itself would enjoy were they to face Russia directly."
Orosz tüzérségi veszteségek havonta (ukrán forrás):
Az ukránok HETI vesztesége viszont 40.
Érdemes figyelmesen elolvasni a teljes 47. pontot, a várható háborús fejlemények kapcsán! Támadó és védőképességekről esik benne szó!
"“Is the Russian army not as capable as some wish to believe?”
You’re referring to offensive capacity here. Russia clearly showed its defensive capabilities during the counteroffensive thus far. So you’re really asking about its offensive capabilities. To answer that fairly, we have to ask, have you seen Russia’s offensive capabilities demonstrated yet in order to be a fair judge of that question?
The answer is no: Russia has not yet even launched an offensive in recent times.
If they had launched a major offensive somewhere and got very badly stopped, then perhaps you could have claim to saying Russia is incapable. But so far, everything Russia has actually tried to take in force, they’ve taken. Bakhmut was the most recent, and it fell. Some argue earlier in the year, Russia failed in Ugledar. But this wasn’t an actual major concerted effort to capture it. This was literally one 155th Marine unit simply trying to entrench themselves in the dachas around the town.
When you see Russia actually attempt to take something, you’ll know it. To do that they surround the entire urban area first, with major forces. That’s what happened in Mariupol and then Lisichansk-Severodonetsk, and slowly in Bakhmut. That type of concerted offensive effort has not happened since."
(...)
“Our current task is to defend and destroy as much of the enemy’s equipment as possible.”
A 46. pontban pedig az ukrán mozgósítást tárgyalja ki, ill. hogy vajon ki ugrik ki elsőnek ebből az ukrán gyártású fék nélküli autóból?
simplicius76.substack.com
... és így tovább ...
Aki azt hitte, hogy Putyin feláldozza Szojgut Prigozsinért, nos, íme a Szojgu (és Putyin) kultusz Tuvában:
(Nézzétek meg, főleg a jurtás részt! A film végén egy kis kitérő a helyi háborús veszteségekre.)
A 10k karakter eddig bírta.
The problem is, Russians are some of the least aware people of conditions in other countries particularly Europe and the West. This results in their perennial pessimism in comparing their conditions to the West. Many Russians will unfavorably compare themselves to Europe or complain about economic matters, low pay, high prices, inflation, etc., while not being cognizant of the fact that all these things are usually worse in most of the West.
In general, ever since Putin got rid of Western NGOs and other propaganda arms, the Russian society has been at its most firm and stable because there aren’t the usual CIA engineered social movements which destabilize every enemy society.
With Soros NGOs gone, Western media throttled, pernicious CIA-provocateurs masquerading as “diplomats” cutdown with major embassy/consul cutbacks, LGBT propaganda dialed down even more than before, as well as cultural shifts to, not deplatform per se, but cut down the reach of other “undesirable” elements of society, like for instance gangster rappers (the worst ones of which were shouldered out of Russia, forced to take refuge in Dubai, etc.). These things have created a much stable and uniform society where even the youthful generation is starting to grow up more culturally and historically aware and educated rather than indoctrinated by anti-Russian or Russophobic nonsense. Partly responsible have been new campaigns and initiatives to redesign curricula in schools which focus on telling correct history."
Mit is akartam mondani? Nahát!? Ismerős? Az.
Más.
"The one important point the article does bring up in allowing me to debunk it is the common trope about Russia’s ethnic regions being disproportionately affected by the war. It’s a repeated syllogism that pro-Ukrainians use to say that Russia is recruiting only from poor border regions, like Tuva, Altai, and Buryatia and that these regions have disproportionate losses compared to ‘cosmopolitan’ ethnic Russian districts like Moscow and St. Petersburg.
The issue is, this does happen but only as a natural consequence of the laws of economics. You see, poorer regions in every country typically have a higher percentage of people joining the military for the competitive pay and social benefits. Additionally, in Russia you get exempted from conscription—and therefore being a reservist who can be mobilized—for attending higher education institutes. In poorer regions, less people go to university and therefore less are exempt, which means a disproportionate amount of them end up in the reservist pool compared to Moscow where many of the cosmopolitans get out of service by virtue of attending graduate school at higher rates. This isn’t a “diabolical plot” of Putin’s, this is how simple socio-economics works."
(...)
"These people are extremely patriotic about the military, far more so per capita than the rich cosmopolitan regions who have more bourgeoisie things to worry about. In short, these people are proud to fight for Russia, and no amount of Western spin about their ‘disproportionate’ participation in the conflict can change that."
A tüzérségről:
"Let’s say hypothetically both sides fire 10,000 shells per day each. Let’s say all 10,000 of the ones Russia fires have a range of 30km. Now let’s say 9,000 of the ones Ukraine fires have a range of 20km, but 1,000 of Ukraine’s have a range of 40km.
Which side has the advantage?
It’s clear that for 90% of the firing, Russia will be outranging Ukraine, and inturn will be outranged in 10% of the cases. I’ve explained before that the standard M107 and M795 NATO rounds that Ukraine uses 98% of the times on their M777s has a shorter range than the standard OF45/61+ Russian rounds used on their 2A65s, 2A36s, etc.
The M777s are Ukraine’s bread and butter most numerous system (150-200). They received a few dozen French Caesars that can hit a tad farther with regular shells than Russia’s main bread and butter howitzers. However Russia has other ‘specialty’ systems like the 2S5 and 2S7s which can hit even farther than Caesars—and Russia has much more of those than Ukraine has of Caesars. So again, Ukraine is at a disadvantage.
Additionally, Russian Lancets now account for the majority of “counter-battery” kills and Ukraine has nothing to match that. Comparing asymmetrically we can say Ukraine has HIMARs which is doing what Russian Lancets are doing, just in a different way. Thus we can say they’re perhaps evenly matched in that one asymmetric subcategory. Though Russia has BM-30 Smerch which is superior to HIMARS in every way: much more powerful rocket of 300mm vs. 227mm, much greater range of 120km vs. 80km+. Russia simply hasn’t produced many GMLRS guided Smerch rockets until recently, but now there’s been an uptick of Russia reportedly using Smerch in the same manner as the HIMARs, long range guided sniping of rear assets—except Smerch packs a much larger punch.
That being said, just because Russia has the advantage or better systems doesn’t mean they can stop the systems Ukraine has. So as you’ve pointed out, the HIMARS has been having some successes, though it comes in spurts and lately it’s once again seems to have been neutralized.
Ukraine exaggerates the success of HIMARS by saving up about one month’s worth of footage, then releasing it all at once as a highlight reel that shows 4-5 spectacular hits at once. This gives the false impression that HIMARS is dominating the battlefield when in reality it’s the only success in weeks. The typical short memories and attention spans of most observers leaves them forgetting about the 3-4 week gaps in between those releases, where HIMARS are not seen doing anything. That’s because they have maybe one decent hit per week, and they save those up into a monthly reel. It’s just more Ukrainian sleight of hand tactics."
(...)
"Russia is forced to fight with hand behind its back as Ukrainian assets like HIMARS are able to freely use Western ISR while Russia can’t strike those ISR capabilities in the same way they would if there was an outright open war against the West. That’s why I’ve pointed out before that Ukraine currently enjoys far more advantages than the West/NATO itself would enjoy were they to face Russia directly."
Orosz tüzérségi veszteségek havonta (ukrán forrás):
Az ukránok HETI vesztesége viszont 40.
Érdemes figyelmesen elolvasni a teljes 47. pontot, a várható háborús fejlemények kapcsán! Támadó és védőképességekről esik benne szó!
"“Is the Russian army not as capable as some wish to believe?”
You’re referring to offensive capacity here. Russia clearly showed its defensive capabilities during the counteroffensive thus far. So you’re really asking about its offensive capabilities. To answer that fairly, we have to ask, have you seen Russia’s offensive capabilities demonstrated yet in order to be a fair judge of that question?
The answer is no: Russia has not yet even launched an offensive in recent times.
If they had launched a major offensive somewhere and got very badly stopped, then perhaps you could have claim to saying Russia is incapable. But so far, everything Russia has actually tried to take in force, they’ve taken. Bakhmut was the most recent, and it fell. Some argue earlier in the year, Russia failed in Ugledar. But this wasn’t an actual major concerted effort to capture it. This was literally one 155th Marine unit simply trying to entrench themselves in the dachas around the town.
When you see Russia actually attempt to take something, you’ll know it. To do that they surround the entire urban area first, with major forces. That’s what happened in Mariupol and then Lisichansk-Severodonetsk, and slowly in Bakhmut. That type of concerted offensive effort has not happened since."
(...)
“Our current task is to defend and destroy as much of the enemy’s equipment as possible.”
A 46. pontban pedig az ukrán mozgósítást tárgyalja ki, ill. hogy vajon ki ugrik ki elsőnek ebből az ukrán gyártású fék nélküli autóból?
Subscriber Mailbag Answers - 9/29/23 [Part 3 Finale]
And we’re back for the final blockbuster installment. Strap in, pop the recliner, grab the whisky because this one’s a provocative doozy, and let’s get to it! 35. What's happening in Ethiopia? Most importantly on our front Ethiopia has recently joined the BRICS, as you may know. Its official...
simplicius76.substack.com
... és így tovább ...
Aki azt hitte, hogy Putyin feláldozza Szojgut Prigozsinért, nos, íme a Szojgu (és Putyin) kultusz Tuvában:
A 10k karakter eddig bírta.
Well, Well, Well," új filmeket adnak a régi mozikban" elenszkij felkötheti a gatyeszt hamarosan....
"We borrow money from China, to sending Ukraine...."
"We borrow money from China, to sending Ukraine...."
2023. 09. 29. Az orosz harckocsi megrohamozza az ukrán állásokat Novomykhailivkától északra
Orosz tüzérség (+ aknák ?) vs. ukrán páncélozott járművek – Artyemovszk (Bakhmut) irányában
Orosz tüzérség (+ aknák ?) vs. ukrán páncélozott járművek – Artyemovszk (Bakhmut) irányában
Jó a videó! Nagyon sok amerikai youtube - os van, akik érdekes videókat csinàlnak Oo-ról,amik többnyire cáfolják az oroszokkal kapcsolatos sztereotópiákat."However, in my view, Russia is currently in its best place in half a century. Certainly in regard to the entire post-USSR period. The public morale, economy, societal solidarity and general political stability is absolutely at its highest.
The problem is, Russians are some of the least aware people of conditions in other countries particularly Europe and the West. This results in their perennial pessimism in comparing their conditions to the West. Many Russians will unfavorably compare themselves to Europe or complain about economic matters, low pay, high prices, inflation, etc., while not being cognizant of the fact that all these things are usually worse in most of the West.
In general, ever since Putin got rid of Western NGOs and other propaganda arms, the Russian society has been at its most firm and stable because there aren’t the usual CIA engineered social movements which destabilize every enemy society.
With Soros NGOs gone, Western media throttled, pernicious CIA-provocateurs masquerading as “diplomats” cutdown with major embassy/consul cutbacks, LGBT propaganda dialed down even more than before, as well as cultural shifts to, not deplatform per se, but cut down the reach of other “undesirable” elements of society, like for instance gangster rappers (the worst ones of which were shouldered out of Russia, forced to take refuge in Dubai, etc.). These things have created a much stable and uniform society where even the youthful generation is starting to grow up more culturally and historically aware and educated rather than indoctrinated by anti-Russian or Russophobic nonsense. Partly responsible have been new campaigns and initiatives to redesign curricula in schools which focus on telling correct history."
Mit is akartam mondani? Nahát!? Ismerős? Az.
Más.
"The one important point the article does bring up in allowing me to debunk it is the common trope about Russia’s ethnic regions being disproportionately affected by the war. It’s a repeated syllogism that pro-Ukrainians use to say that Russia is recruiting only from poor border regions, like Tuva, Altai, and Buryatia and that these regions have disproportionate losses compared to ‘cosmopolitan’ ethnic Russian districts like Moscow and St. Petersburg.
The issue is, this does happen but only as a natural consequence of the laws of economics. You see, poorer regions in every country typically have a higher percentage of people joining the military for the competitive pay and social benefits. Additionally, in Russia you get exempted from conscription—and therefore being a reservist who can be mobilized—for attending higher education institutes. In poorer regions, less people go to university and therefore less are exempt, which means a disproportionate amount of them end up in the reservist pool compared to Moscow where many of the cosmopolitans get out of service by virtue of attending graduate school at higher rates. This isn’t a “diabolical plot” of Putin’s, this is how simple socio-economics works."
(...)
"These people are extremely patriotic about the military, far more so per capita than the rich cosmopolitan regions who have more bourgeoisie things to worry about. In short, these people are proud to fight for Russia, and no amount of Western spin about their ‘disproportionate’ participation in the conflict can change that."
A tüzérségről:
"Let’s say hypothetically both sides fire 10,000 shells per day each. Let’s say all 10,000 of the ones Russia fires have a range of 30km. Now let’s say 9,000 of the ones Ukraine fires have a range of 20km, but 1,000 of Ukraine’s have a range of 40km.
Which side has the advantage?
It’s clear that for 90% of the firing, Russia will be outranging Ukraine, and inturn will be outranged in 10% of the cases. I’ve explained before that the standard M107 and M795 NATO rounds that Ukraine uses 98% of the times on their M777s has a shorter range than the standard OF45/61+ Russian rounds used on their 2A65s, 2A36s, etc.
The M777s are Ukraine’s bread and butter most numerous system (150-200). They received a few dozen French Caesars that can hit a tad farther with regular shells than Russia’s main bread and butter howitzers. However Russia has other ‘specialty’ systems like the 2S5 and 2S7s which can hit even farther than Caesars—and Russia has much more of those than Ukraine has of Caesars. So again, Ukraine is at a disadvantage.
Additionally, Russian Lancets now account for the majority of “counter-battery” kills and Ukraine has nothing to match that. Comparing asymmetrically we can say Ukraine has HIMARs which is doing what Russian Lancets are doing, just in a different way. Thus we can say they’re perhaps evenly matched in that one asymmetric subcategory. Though Russia has BM-30 Smerch which is superior to HIMARS in every way: much more powerful rocket of 300mm vs. 227mm, much greater range of 120km vs. 80km+. Russia simply hasn’t produced many GMLRS guided Smerch rockets until recently, but now there’s been an uptick of Russia reportedly using Smerch in the same manner as the HIMARs, long range guided sniping of rear assets—except Smerch packs a much larger punch.
That being said, just because Russia has the advantage or better systems doesn’t mean they can stop the systems Ukraine has. So as you’ve pointed out, the HIMARS has been having some successes, though it comes in spurts and lately it’s once again seems to have been neutralized.
Ukraine exaggerates the success of HIMARS by saving up about one month’s worth of footage, then releasing it all at once as a highlight reel that shows 4-5 spectacular hits at once. This gives the false impression that HIMARS is dominating the battlefield when in reality it’s the only success in weeks. The typical short memories and attention spans of most observers leaves them forgetting about the 3-4 week gaps in between those releases, where HIMARS are not seen doing anything. That’s because they have maybe one decent hit per week, and they save those up into a monthly reel. It’s just more Ukrainian sleight of hand tactics."
(...)
"Russia is forced to fight with hand behind its back as Ukrainian assets like HIMARS are able to freely use Western ISR while Russia can’t strike those ISR capabilities in the same way they would if there was an outright open war against the West. That’s why I’ve pointed out before that Ukraine currently enjoys far more advantages than the West/NATO itself would enjoy were they to face Russia directly."
Orosz tüzérségi veszteségek havonta (ukrán forrás):
Az ukránok HETI vesztesége viszont 40.
Érdemes figyelmesen elolvasni a teljes 47. pontot, a várható háborús fejlemények kapcsán! Támadó és védőképességekről esik benne szó!
"“Is the Russian army not as capable as some wish to believe?”
You’re referring to offensive capacity here. Russia clearly showed its defensive capabilities during the counteroffensive thus far. So you’re really asking about its offensive capabilities. To answer that fairly, we have to ask, have you seen Russia’s offensive capabilities demonstrated yet in order to be a fair judge of that question?
The answer is no: Russia has not yet even launched an offensive in recent times.
If they had launched a major offensive somewhere and got very badly stopped, then perhaps you could have claim to saying Russia is incapable. But so far, everything Russia has actually tried to take in force, they’ve taken. Bakhmut was the most recent, and it fell. Some argue earlier in the year, Russia failed in Ugledar. But this wasn’t an actual major concerted effort to capture it. This was literally one 155th Marine unit simply trying to entrench themselves in the dachas around the town.
When you see Russia actually attempt to take something, you’ll know it. To do that they surround the entire urban area first, with major forces. That’s what happened in Mariupol and then Lisichansk-Severodonetsk, and slowly in Bakhmut. That type of concerted offensive effort has not happened since."
(...)
“Our current task is to defend and destroy as much of the enemy’s equipment as possible.”
A 46. pontban pedig az ukrán mozgósítást tárgyalja ki, ill. hogy vajon ki ugrik ki elsőnek ebből az ukrán gyártású fék nélküli autóból?
Subscriber Mailbag Answers - 9/29/23 [Part 3 Finale]
And we’re back for the final blockbuster installment. Strap in, pop the recliner, grab the whisky because this one’s a provocative doozy, and let’s get to it! 35. What's happening in Ethiopia? Most importantly on our front Ethiopia has recently joined the BRICS, as you may know. Its official...
... és így tovább ...
Aki azt hitte, hogy Putyin feláldozza Szojgut Prigozsinért, nos, íme a Szojgu (és Putyin) kultusz Tuvában:
(Nézzétek meg, főleg a jurtás részt! A film végén egy kis kitérő a helyi háborús veszteségekre.)
A 10k karakter eddig bírta.
Valaki tud az éjjel állítólag leszedett Szu-35-ről Tokmak (?!?!) felett?
Próbáltam utánanézni, de semmi nincs ezen a béna éjszakai felvételen, meg a Fighterbomber búcsúztató üzenetén kívül.
Próbáltam utánanézni, de semmi nincs ezen a béna éjszakai felvételen, meg a Fighterbomber búcsúztató üzenetén kívül.
A légideszant csapatok az egykori Wagner-vadászokkal együtt behatoltak Veseloye faluba, amely Soledartól északra található. Heves és kemény harcok folynak. Minden típusú tüzérség és drón működik. Van haladás....Megnyílt az út Severks felé.
t.me
Az Uralvagonzavod közzéteszi a következő új T-90 tank tesztjét (forradalom).
https://t.me/i20028843/142733
English Daily Star Putyin új fegyveréről - az Alabuga EMP rakétáról:
Az „Alabugok” állítólag egész hadseregeket pusztítanak el és száz méter mélyen eltemetett betonbunkereket érnek el nagyfrekvenciás sugárzással. A robbanás epicentrumától számított nyolc kilométeres körzetben pedig minden katonai felszerelés meghibásodik, ha az Alabuga miniegységet drónokra helyezik. Ezek a lőszerek repülés közben képesek a repülőgépek és a légelhárító rakéták sugárzás általi megsemmisítésére, a földön pedig megakadályozzák a tankok automatikus feltöltését, felrobbantják a tüzérségi lövedékeket a torony belsejében, és akár 100 méteres mélységben is képesek megölni a föld alá rejtett katonákat. sugárzást használva ezt nem kommentálom... Hadd üljenek és féljenek.
t.me
Artemovsk Igazgatóság
Északi szárny
Információ az „új” PMC egység srácaitól, amelyet a közeljövőben jelentenek be.
Orekhovo-Vasilevo térségében minden ellenséges támadást visszavertek, jelenleg a falu teljesen mögöttünk van. Az ellenség több egység páncélozott harcjárművet és legfeljebb egy századnyi munkaerőt veszített. Érdekes módon az ellenség nem nyugati páncélozott járművek, hanem BMP-1 és BMP-2 ellen hajtott végre támadást.
Most egy pozitív hír. A légideszant egységek behatoltak Veseloye faluba, amely Soledartól északra található. Heves harc folyik.
t.me
IL RUSSO
☄️☄️☄️☝️The airborne troops, together with the former Wagner fighters, entered the village of Veseloye, located north of Soledar. Intense and heavy fighting is underway. Artillery and drones of all types are working. There is progress....The road to Severks is open☄️☄️☄️
t.me
Az Uralvagonzavod közzéteszi a következő új T-90 tank tesztjét (forradalom).
https://t.me/i20028843/142733
English Daily Star Putyin új fegyveréről - az Alabuga EMP rakétáról:
Az „Alabugok” állítólag egész hadseregeket pusztítanak el és száz méter mélyen eltemetett betonbunkereket érnek el nagyfrekvenciás sugárzással. A robbanás epicentrumától számított nyolc kilométeres körzetben pedig minden katonai felszerelés meghibásodik, ha az Alabuga miniegységet drónokra helyezik. Ezek a lőszerek repülés közben képesek a repülőgépek és a légelhárító rakéták sugárzás általi megsemmisítésére, a földön pedig megakadályozzák a tankok automatikus feltöltését, felrobbantják a tüzérségi lövedékeket a torony belsejében, és akár 100 méteres mélységben is képesek megölni a föld alá rejtett katonákat. sugárzást használva ezt nem kommentálom... Hadd üljenek és féljenek.
IL RUSSO
⚡️⚡️⚡️English Daily Star about Putin's new weapon - the Alabuga EMP missile: The “Alabugs” are supposed to destroy entire armies and reach concrete bunkers buried a hundred meters deep using high-frequency radiation. And any military equipment within a radius of eight kilometers from the...
t.me
Artemovsk Igazgatóság
Északi szárny
Információ az „új” PMC egység srácaitól, amelyet a közeljövőben jelentenek be.
Orekhovo-Vasilevo térségében minden ellenséges támadást visszavertek, jelenleg a falu teljesen mögöttünk van. Az ellenség több egység páncélozott harcjárművet és legfeljebb egy századnyi munkaerőt veszített. Érdekes módon az ellenség nem nyugati páncélozott járművek, hanem BMP-1 és BMP-2 ellen hajtott végre támadást.
Most egy pozitív hír. A légideszant egységek behatoltak Veseloye faluba, amely Soledartól északra található. Heves harc folyik.
IL RUSSO
☄️☄️☄️☝️Artemovsk Directorate Northern flank Information from the guys of the “new” PMC unit, which will be announced in the near future. All enemy attacks have been repelled in the Orekhovo-Vasilevo area, currently the village is completely behind us. The enemy lost several units of...
t.me
The Russian Alabuga complex will be “more powerful than a nuclear bomb”
The Russian Alabuga complex will be “more powerful than a nuclear bomb”The Russian Federation is developing a missile equipped with a high-power high-frequency generator, which will make it possible to neutralize the enemy without firing a single shot. I
Tényleg azt hiszi valaki itt a fórumon, hogy megvonják Ukrajnától a támogatást és engedik hogy elessen?Well, Well, Well," új filmeket adnak a régi mozikban" elenszkij felkötheti a gatyeszt hamarosan....
"We borrow money from China, to sending Ukraine...."
Teljesen kizárt. Ugyanis az a nyugat vereségét jelentené (mivel az országok is látják, hogy mire megy ki a játék), ami az arcvesztésük okán felérne egy katasztrófával. Az eddig még ingadozó államok azonnal a globális dél oldalára sorolnának.
Erre tekintettel, az atlantisták az utolsó ukránig, majd az utolsó k-európaiig, majd az utolsó nyugat-európaiig fognak háborúzni és ha így sem megy, akkor inkább pusztuljon a világ.
Nincs más választásuk csak előre, ha már beszálltak ebbe a háborúba. Ha veszítenek minden oda, ha nyernek, azonban Kína is az ölükbe fog hullni, úgy hogy nem kell angolszász vért hullajtani.
A republiknusok is pont olyanok mint a demek. Egy a gazdi. Két kutyát tart pórázon, és éppen azt engedi előre amelyiket a helyzet kívánja. Trump sem baleset volt. Ennyire nem idétlenek. Akkor éppen rá volt szükség, mint szelepre, hogy levezesse a jobboldalon felgyülemlett társadalmi feszültségeket.
Egy szó, mint száz. Ne várjatok nagy csodákat, ha esetleg megint a repek nyernének. Menni fog tovább a daráló, ennél jobb megoldásuk nincsen.
Nem lesz mivel támogatni. Már most se nagyon van.
Tehát nem tud mást tenni, mint elengedi a kezét, és kiszáll, vagy sokkal csúnyább vége lesz
Szerintem pedig olyan simán elengedik a kezüket, mint ha sosem fogták volna.
Lassan senki nem marad a nagy Majdanos mókamesterek közül, hogy élvezze az EUs és NATO tagságot!
t.me
FAB-500 mókázott:
T-90 teszt:
IL RUSSO
☄️☄️☄️☝️During the SVO, one of the Euromaidan coordinators, Vladimir Mironyuk, was eliminated. He has been fighting in Donbass since 2014 as part of the “right sector”*. Several years ago he emigrated to the United States, from where he returned to Ukraine after the start of a special...
t.me
FAB-500 mókázott:
T-90 teszt:
És ebben az ügyben fő szerepeket játszó, Ukrajnát gazdaságilag-politikailag felvásárló, nemzetközi politikus-oligarcha réteg már nem fog a toronyházak ablakaiból fejest ugrálni a betonra (sajnos) hogy elvesztette az oroszok által kétessé leminősített befektetéseit, mely által lehetett Ukrajnából a harci dárdára kötözött proxi harcos Rozsomákot fabrikálni és a Nagy Fehér Főnökünk azt bátran betolta a Medve barlangjába.. Évek során ahhoz kell hozzászokjanak hogy hideg vizet ihatnak a befektetésükre, és az elkobzott orosz vagyon "privatizálásával" kárpótólják magukat.
Szerintem ha errefelé is araszolnak az események, erre még évekkel később kerülhet sor, hiszen még nyugati oldalon sorba állnak a fegyvergyárak teszteletlen fegyverei és harctéri kísérleti megoldásai a jövedelmünkből felpántlikázva a "segély" címén levont kötelező adakozásokkal. Amíg az ukrán térfelen marad még pár fegyvert tartó kéz, addig megy ez a valódi terepasztalos gyakorlatozás.
Az EU-ban is a szakadék széle felé, mélyrepülést szemlélgetve araszol a gazdaság, de már világosan látszik a célkeresztben a bányászbéka s@gge. Ettől még messze vagyunk de reálisabb tervnek néz ki mint a szovjet 3 éves volt annó..
Dél-Vietnám, az se volt egy szép történet, amíg volt
Már többször leírtam ezt a véleményemet, az oroszok meg a kínaiak nem fogják kiengedni az angolszászokat ebből a háborúból.
Valami zavart érzek, az egész bagázs nem tud az Oroszok ellen nyerni, ha észrevetted pont a fordítottja alakul.
Hát ennyivel nem intézném el Kínát kik 30-50 millió embert tudnak mozgósítani végszükség esetén. Szólnának a kis köpcösnek a rakétáit ne Japán fele lövöldözze hanem másik irányba.
Azt azért ne felejtsük, hogy az USA a hagyományosan vett katonai viszonylatban kb semmivel sem lett erősebb az Oroszokkal szemben. Az oroszok a nagyhatalmakkal szemben az atomütőerejükre támaszkodnak. Szerintem sosem volt az USA gyengébb mint most. Most az orosz 100x kozelebb van ahhoz, hogy atomfegyvert használjon ha esetleg valaki hátulról bekóstolja. Mert nincs is más opció.
Putyin a különleges katonai hadműveletben részt vevő katonákkal találkozott
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/72397
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/72397