Err, nem egeszen. Az o taskajaban talaltak, ezen a ponton, ha jol ertem a belga torvenyeket, o mar minimum szabalyserto, azaz mar nagyon nehez lesz az artatlansagat feltetelezni (erre ugye van a jogalkalmazoi gyakorlat, ha valaki ismeri a belgat buntetougyi gyakorlatot, akkor az biztos meg tudja mondani, ilyesmire mit ker az ugyesz ill mit ajanl fel.).
Nem ismerem a belga törvényeket, de az alábbi összefoglaló alapján nagyjából ugyanaz, mint a magyar. A kannabisz csekély mennyiségben csak szabálysértés, egy kisebb pénzbüntetéssel, egyébként pedig ugyanúgy ismeri a privilegizált (enyhébb megítélésű) fogyasztói alakzatot és az elterelést. A belgáknál ha jól látom a kannabisz is sokkal enyhébb megítélésű.
Ez eddig csekély mennyiség birtoklása, de a birtoklásnak is tudatosnak kell lennie, tehát ha valaki betette a táskájába, vagy nem tudott róla, az nem birtoklás.
Ezt a vádnak kell bizonyítania, az pedig nehézkes. Az sem teljesen életszerűtlen, hogy ha a rendőr nem tud mivel megfogni, egyszerűen betesz a táskádba egy eki tabit. Ha rendszeres fogyasztó volt, az egy drogteszten kijönne, ha osztogatni ment (nagyon valószínűtlen hogy ezzel maszekolt volna a 10-20 ezer eurós havi fizu és költségtérítés mellett), azt pedig tanúknak kellene igazolni.
EMCDDA | Country legal profiles (europa.eu)
Drug use and possession
In January 2001 a Policy Note (programmatic policy document) was adopted by the federal government. This note expressed the intention to modify the law in order to reduce the penalty for non-problematic use of cannabis. Since 2 June 2003, Belgian law punishes possession of up to 3 grammes of cannabis or cannabis resin with a police fine of 75-125 euros. The same applies for possession of one cannabis plant in cultivation. Should the offender be found with cannabis again within one year, there will be a fine of 130-250 euros, and a third offence within a year of the second may result in imprisonment for 8 days - 1 month and a fine of 250-500 euros. Cannabis oil or cake cannot be interpreted as for personal use, no matter how small the amount. If there is an element of public nuisance, such as smoking in the presence of minors, near schools or army barracks, the penalty will be from 3 months to 1 year in prison and/or a fine of 5000 - 500 000 euros. If there is evidence of problematic use, the offender will be assigned a case manager by the prosecutor to receive appropriate therapeutic counselling.
Belgian law punishes possession of drugs other than cannabis by imprisonment for between three months and five years, and/or a fine. The term of imprisonment may be increased to fifteen or even twenty years in the event of specified aggravating circumstances (drug offences in relation to minors aged less than twelve, or committed in the course of a criminal organisation such as manager of a criminal organisation)
[2] .
Possession for personal use can give rise to a suspended sentence, either with a probation order or not. [3] The practical application of the law, especially concerning drug use and possession, has been the object of revision by the Federal Ministry of Justice which issued the following two policy guidelines in order to harmonise the practical enforcement of the law.
On 26 May 1993 a directive (circular) was addressed to public prosecutors setting out a number of general principles for the establishment of a uniform policy on handling drug offence cases. In the directive a distinction is made between occasional users, regular users and dealers.
Regular users are to be given every possible opportunity to seek and obtain treatment. Addicts are usually regarded as sick persons who need to be protected from themselves and against whom society also needs protection. The gravity of the offence committed, the repetitive nature of the offence and the offenders intentions are taken into account when determining what happens to the offender in other words, whether the offender goes to prison or is given the opportunity to follow treatment. As a consequence of the differing application of the directive, a non-uniform drug prosecution policy remained in practice.
